can you plunge in from the thousands of angles that would be necessary for an acceptable representation of a non-biased agent? could you possibly identify enough of the underlying structure to accurately depict the nature of the agents subjective thoughts. you must always remember that we do not have access. we may design experiments and we may listen to introspective accounts... but the process... as it happens... is still illusive.
how can we get far away enough to say the correct things? it must start with simplicity. no jargon. no causality assumed.
and why does it matter when i only want love and respect?
yeah right you fucking gays. ( <------- that is exactly how i would answer the rhetorical question directly above)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment